Furthermore, Montressor was not only interested in murder, one of his primary goals was to kill and to hide the evidence of the crime, to hide the body so that no one would know that Fortunato died from the hands of an assassin. No reason was given as to why Montressor wanted his friend dead. He could have sought justice through the legal process but instead he opted to become a murderer.Īnother thing that Montressor did that could easily arouse the suspicion of the reader is his being secretive. If he was a man who was at the receiving end of iniquity then he should have felt violated and demand that the lawbreaker pay for his sins. However, Montressor did not went to the authorities. Through the words of the narrator Montressor was characterized as a man who was a victim of a foul crime. This means that Montressor cannot be a reliable narrator and this assertion can be supported by looking at the way Montressor was characterized in this story.Ī wary reader can immediately sense that something is amiss when it comes to the characterization of Montressor.

This means that he can twist the facts and he can project himself as the hero of the story when in fact he could be the villain. He was the first person to use the term ‘short story’ Poe wrote this story as an act of revenge to another writer This subreddit is for discussion of fiction using information about the universe and not meta information about the work.Montresor chains Fortunato to a wall and bricks up the opening. Spoilers from works older than six months may optionally be concealed using our flair system, however this is CSS-based and will work only in browsers.Our Spoiler policy must be observed for six months following the date of release.Comment spoilers should be formatted on a separate line as >!.Replace 'Canon' with the work or body of fiction in question. If only the body of your post contains spoilers, you may instead make the title ' Spoilers: Canon' and not use the link flair. The title of your post should not contain spoilers for six months from the date of release.'Speed Force' with no further explanation when asked a question about the Flash) do not constitute satisfactory answers. Report anything that discusses metadata or involves personal attacks. Upvote good content downvote incorrect information.

(This doesn't, of course, mean there isn't room for further discussion.) Search for your question, it may have been asked and answered before.Any sort of competition questions belong in whowouldwin.AskScience and AskHistorians exist for that. r/whatiffiction, a sister subreddit, has rules more accommodating to these sort of questions. General questions are discouraged without a firm set of in-universe rules, most of them boil down to 'whatever the writer chooses' in terms of answers.Avoid questions about real-world pseudoscience (i.e. Any fiction is allowed not just science fiction.You already know Bruce Wayne is Batman, you already know Darth Vader is Anakin Skywalker, you already know Sauron is evil. However, if you choose to roleplay, please remember that you must answer as if you had all the information available to a member of the audience. We discourage but do not forbid roleplaying.Answer the questions from a Watsonian perspective only- no Doylist answers.your posts with the setting you wish to discuss.Take the fictional rules of the universe to their logical conclusion, ad absurdum. Doylist perspective can be found here, here, and in the dictionary definitions of the two terms.) Or as calls it Watsonian, not a Doylist point of view (Further reading on Watsonian vs. Use in-universe knowledge, rules, and common sense to answer the questions. It's like Ask Science, but all questions and answers are written with answers gleaned from the universe itself.

Did fortunato deserve to die